tired of noise like this, most human writing is slop too, what kind of insight is "A lot of why this is a difficult problem to solve boils down to humans and agents being very different kinds of beings" supposed to provide? and also: "We’re in the odd position of needing to make all the important decisions up front because an agent has to go on the journey alone." No we're not. It's awesome. Just accept that agile development was a deeply flawed idea to compensate for humans possessing low bandwidth for software development, we live in a waterfall world now. or: "There are some very obvious problems here. Especially in a CLI interface, I can’t edit the plan directly. The plan almost always has open questions in it, despite the grilling process, and I don’t have an interface for answering them." ??????? Skill issue. Idc if you're a staff engineer at GitHub, is dumb to treat this like some attention-worthy tricky problem, but if you actually find the Matt Pocock skills to be useful, then I understand why you might overthink this from the wrong perspective 🌚🌚 or: "Humans are not efficient readers. We can read about 240 words a minute, and an agent can write about 4,500, which is 19 times faster than we can read." ?????????? Skill issue.

Planning with Agents: Divided Worlds, Boundary Objects, and Thicker InterfacesWhy we need richer, thicker interfaces and better boundary objects for collaborative planning with agentsmaggieappleton.com