ONE THOUSAND WORDS (2/5) Next comes the social contract. Network School asks users to vote on the rules of its client. Saying yes accepts its code and grants its operators authority to enforce and change the rules. Saying no, or not voting, restricts posting through that client, not your Farcaster identity. Other clients still use the open network. This is a philosophical shift. Many platforms govern through terms nobody reads, then change policies without a clear moment of consent. Network School puts the agreement at the front door and records a choice onchain. But consent is only the beginning. A yes vote isn’t permanent approval for every future change. Members need to know how rules evolve, who interprets them and how they appeal enforcement decisions. The experiment isn’t simply voting onchain. It’s whether communities can make governance explicit, predictable and voluntary while remaining connected through a shared protocol.
Farcaster
Quorum
Firefly
Quilcast
Neynar
Vibeshift
Opencaster
HomieHouse
Terminus